The Orchard doesn’t have a sole senior or lead pastor as many other churches do. For some people this might seem a little odd. Why don’t we have a senior pastor? It might be helpful to look at this question from a slightly different perspective: Why should a church have a senior pastor? More specifically, is there any biblical basis for this special leadership role in the church?
Suppose we set out to find the biblical teaching on senior pastors. So we get on our Bible app and look up every reference in Scripture to senior pastors or pastors in general. Imagine our surprise when we find no mention of senior pastors in the Bible, and only one place where the English word “pastor” is used at all. That’s it! No passages describing the “pastor” of a church, or directly addressing “pastors.” It would be confusing, to say the least.
But we don’t give up yet! We resolve to dig more deeply into the original languages. That single reference to “pastors” (Ephesians 4:11) is from the Greek word poimēn. We find that, unlike the English word “pastor,” poimēn is used 18 times in the New Testament. It’s translated “pastor” only once; the other 17 times, it’s rendered “shepherd.” This makes sense to us. We probably know the English word pastor means shepherd.
(This connection is even more clear in Spanish, where there is only one word used. The Spanish word pastor can refer to either a pastor of a church or someone who tends literal sheep. For example, El Buen Pastor is often used as a church name: The Good Shepherd. This is also why our English word “pastoral” can refer to idyllic places where sheep graze or to the shepherding of people in the church.)
So now we’re ready to search out what the Bible has to say concerning those who shepherd or pastor the churches. Again, we’re surprised. According to Scripture, the people responsible for shepherding or pastoring the church are the elders or overseers of the church.
From Miletus, Paul sent to Ephesus for the elders of the church. When they arrived, he said to them, “. . . Keep watch over yourselves and all the flock of which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers. Be shepherds of the church of God, which he bought with his own blood.”
Acts 20:17-18, 28To the elders among you, I appeal as a fellow elder . . . : Be shepherds of God’s flock that is under your care, watching over them—not because you must, but because you are willing, as God wants you to be; not pursuing dishonest gain, but eager to serve; not lording it over those entrusted to you, but being examples to the flock.
1 Peter 5:1-3
As we study these passages and others, it becomes clear the apostles were using the terms “elder” and “overseer” interchangeably. The Acts passage above demonstrates this well. Paul is speaking to the elders of the church, refers to them as overseers (or “bishops” in some older translations), and then tells them they are to be shepherds or pastors of the church of God. In 1 Peter 5, he describes one of the duties of these elders as “watching over” the flock, which more literally means “overseeing” them, again using the terms synonymously. And, again, these elders are to be shepherds or pastors of God’s flock.
Paul’s instructions to Titus provide us another example of the interchangeable nature of the terms elder and overseer:
The reason I left you in Crete was that you might put in order what was left unfinished and appoint elders in every town, as I directed you. An elder must be blameless . . . since an overseer manages God’s household.
Titus 1:5-7
So it’s the elders of the church who are to shepherd or pastor the church. According to 1 Timothy 5:17, elders of the church are the ones doing the preaching and teaching (or, more accurately, studying God’s Word and then teaching it), not the sole “senior pastor.” And 1 Timothy 5:17 also tells us it’s certain elders (plural) who are supported financially by the local church (not the senior pastor). We’re finding that the biblical model of pastoral leadership seems surprisingly different from what many of us have seen traditionally in church ministry.
The Bible never specifically addresses “pastors” because it usually refers to the pastoral leaders of the church as “elders.” This was the common term used by the ancient Jews for this kind of leadership role. (In areas that were more culturally Greek, Paul often used their familiar term “overseers.”) In our culture today, our common word for this kind of ministry function is “pastors.” But we need to understand the elders were the pastors of the New Testament church. There’s no biblical distinction between an elder, an overseer/bishop, and a church pastor (someone who pastors the whole church). Elder and overseer are different terms for the same church office, and pastor describes the function of these leaders (what they do, i.e., they shepherd the church).
Not only do we not find any churches in the Bible led by a senior pastor, we don’t find any examples of one leader serving as the sole elder or pastor of a church either. But while the traditional office of pastor is strangely missing from Scripture, there’s a clear pattern of each church being led by a group of godly elders/pastors. The first Christian church was led by a group of twelve apostles, with no one taking a separate office of “senior apostle” or “lead apostle.” This model is consistently followed and taught throughout the New Testament:
Paul and Barnabas appointed elders [plural] for them in each church [singular] and, with prayer and fasting, committed them to the Lord, in whom they had put their trust.
Acts 14:23. . . Paul sent to Ephesus for the elders of the church.
Acts 20:17. . . To all the saints in Christ Jesus at Philippi, together with the overseers and deacons.
Philippians 1:1The elders who direct the affairs of the church well are worthy of double honor, especially those whose work is preaching and teaching.
1 Timothy 5:17The reason I left you in Crete was that you might put in order what was left unfinished and appoint elders in every town, as I directed you. [Note: In the early church, there was only one church in each town.]
Titus 1:5Is any one of you sick? Call the elders of the church to pray over you . . .
James 5:14
The Bible definitely shows a strong pattern of each individual church being led by a group of leaders. And, again, it never shows one individual taking a senior or lead pastor role. We’re given accounts in Scripture of elders being appointed, qualifications for elders, and instructions given directly to elders. But with all the issues the churches were facing, and all the letters being sent to the churches, we don’t have even a single letter sent to “the pastor” of the church in Corinth, or Ephesus, etc. From our modern perspective, that’s a pretty shocking absence. We have no account of the appointment of a senior or sole pastor, no qualifications for a senior or sole pastor, and nowhere is “the pastor” of a church directly addressed.
If we’re going to designate one leader as the pastor of a church, in distinction from the other elders, the burden is on us to show how this is scriptural. As pastor and author Alexander Strauch has pointed out, the Bible gives us far more information concerning the plural leadership of the church than it does many other important teachings, such as baptism and communion. Can we ignore it?
By using different terms interchangeably for the same church office, Scripture demonstrates it’s not the name of the leadership position that’s important but the nature of the leadership role. Whether we call these leaders elders, overseers, bishops, ministers, or pastors, the important thing is we’re following the biblical model of church leadership by a council of leaders with no leader promoted to authority over the rest.
A few churches have adopted the term “senior pastors” (plural) for their elders. We can debate the practical wisdom of this, but there’s no violation here of the biblical principle. Many other churches state boldly that “Jesus Christ is our senior pastor”—and then they designate someone else as their “lead pastor”! I find this supposed contrast between “senior pastor” and “lead pastor” to be a distinction without a difference, and a clear contradiction of not only the biblical teaching but the churches’ own stated principle. The issue isn’t what terminology a church is using, but how their pastoral leadership actually functions.
It might be encouraging to learn we’re not alone in seeing these discrepancies between common traditional models and the scriptural pattern. Pastors and scholars have been discussing these issues throughout much of the history of the church. The consensus among an overwhelming majority of biblical scholars and church historians is that the first century church was led as we discovered above. And more churches every day are committing themselves to applying these New Testament principles of church leadership.
One last point: we find it very compelling that the only use in Scripture of the Greek word for a sole chief or head pastor (archepoimēn) is used specifically of Christ in 1 Peter 5:4. We need to be wary of encroaching on the authority of our Lord. The body has only one Head; the kingdom has only one King. The elders/pastors of a church are merely under-shepherds who look to the Chief Shepherd of the flock for his will concerning his sheep. Like good sheepdogs, we don’t draw the sheep after us; we direct their attention continually to the Shepherd. Our prayer is that we would be very sensitive to the leading and guiding of our “Senior Pastor,” and that we would be faithful to fulfill his will, for his glory and the benefit of his people.
Related posts:
Challenges to Team Pastoral Leadership
What Do Elders (or Pastors) Do?
Should Elders (or Pastors) Be Financially Supported?
Hi, Clive. Thanks for your thoughtful comment. Let me offer some thoughts in response. (Hopefully, I'm not misunderstanding your comment!) I think there are dangers on either side of this question of leadership. We can overemphasize the idea of leadership and end up wrongly exalting and empowering one leader or even a group of leaders, which can lead to authoritarianism in the church. On the other side, we can claim that church elders are not to actually provide real leadership in the churches at all.
I think there real problems with this second option biblically, though. Peter expressed the need for a right approach to this when he warned the church elders not to "lord it over" those entrusted to them (1 Peter 5:3). This would seem to be a nonsensical warning if the elders weren't to exercise leadership in the church at all. As you pointed out, the Holy Spirit distributes gifts among the body to be used in ministering to the body. And, according to Romans 12:8, one of these gifts to be used for the good of the church is leadership. It would be odd to assume this gift wouldn't be exercised by those to whom Christ entrusts the church. In Hebrews 13:17, the people in the church are instructed to obey their leaders. This doesn't explicitly connect this to the elders, this is true, but it's hard to imagine this not referring to the church's elders. (I'm not sure who else it would be speaking of.)
Anyone who's sat through a meeting without someone leading, or leading poorly (not getting the meeting started, not wrapping it up, not keeping it moving, etc) can understand how leading can be done as a way of *serving* the group. I think it's easy to see how this can be lovingly using a gift from the Spirit intended to benefit the body. This gift can be abused, of course, just as any other spiritual gift can be abused. But I don't see in Scripture where Christ intends his church to function without human leadership. Quite the contrary, the *Shepherd* of the church even calls the elders to be *shepherds* of the local churches, calling them to share—to some extent—in his ministry to the church. I fail to see how one can shepherd without leading. That seems to be an integral part of shepherding. There's a lot more to it—yes! But I don't think you can extract the concept of leadership from shepherding.
Jesus showed the kind of leadership to which he calls us, that it's to be done with humility and a desire to serve. He modeled this humble service beautifully—but that doesn't mean he didn't lead. It's easy to just be dictators to the church. It's also easy to simply abdicate any real leadership role in the church. It's much harder to lead lovingly, humbly, with a desire to truly serve the church through our leadership. But this is the leadership to which I see Jesus in Scripture calling the elders of his church.
Thanks again for your comment!
It seems to me that you've successfully and correctly disposed of the concept not only of the 'senior pastor' but any single pastor figure Curt. Human nature is to seek to identify and follow a 'leader' figure, but this is not Scriptural. The leader of the church is Christ by His Holy Spirit, being worked out by the gifts and ministries distributed amongst the body, as per Corinthians. Without a human 'leader' figure, this tends to get messy, hence the need for mature and responsible elders who 'oversee' this activity. I don't believe it's appropriate to associate the concept of leadership with these elders. As you point out, apart from Ephesians 4, poimen is used either to indicate the sort of gentle shepherding activity carried out by elders, or else to describe actual shepherds e.g. in parables. I don't believe that its single appearance as 'pastor' in Ephesians 4 is sufficient to justify the typical 'pastor' role as it exists and functions in today's church.